• 0Shopping Cart
National Squash League
  • 2026 Tickets
  • 2026 Schedule
  • 2026 Match Results
  • Teams
    • Men’s Teams
      • Atlanta Tornados
      • Chicago Grizzlies
      • Louisville Colts
      • Greenwich Panthers
      • Lake Erie Beacons
      • Nashville Crushers
      • Newport Dragons
      • New York Knights
      • Philadelphia Lightning
    • Women’s Teams
      • District Inferno
      • Lake Erie Beacons
      • New York Queens
      • Philadelphia Freedom
      • Seattle Freeze
      • Sono Sharks
  • Sponsors & Partners
  • Shop Merchandise
  • Latest News
  • About NSL
    • About NSL
    • NSL Rules
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Buy Tickets!

How Lake Erie Utilized Pace Against Greenwich

May 14, 2026/in Uncategorized/by Michael Neff

 

Despite losing to the Grizzlies in their first match of the season, the Lake Erie Beacons shocked the NSL world. Their lineup of Tom Walsh, Ben Smith, and David Baillargeon came together to give an uber-talented Greenwich lineup all they could handle. This weekend, Smith and Baillargeon return for Lake Erie alongside World #35 Yannick Wilhelmi to take on a Newport Dragons team with the 1 seed in their sights. Could Lake Erie spoil the party for Newport?

 

It’s easy to dismiss them based on the on-paper talent discrepancy, though we already have proof of concept that the Beacons won’t go gentle into that good night. Ahead of their match, let’s dive into how they got the most out of their lineup against Greenwich. 

 

Know Your Role

 

I’ve written extensively about the three different positional roles an NSL player can occupy: attacker, defender, and utility player. Lake Erie stayed in this match because the coaches understood their players’ strengths and how they could apply to each role. Ben Smith’s attacking role in this match has been well-documented. Smith ended up playing all four of Lake Erie’s power plays and scored 14 points. Smith was encouraged to loosen his wrist and take the ball in short as often as he could in the hopes of winning his minutes. Tom Walsh and David Baillargeon played much more conservatively as defenders. Each player clearly knew their role in this match, and thus felt empowered to execute it. 

 

The Lake Erie coaching staff displayed excellent command over NSL strategy regarding player roles. But, upon rewatching the match, something new caught my eye: utilizing a slow pace. I’ll explain. 

 

Pace in the NSL

 

Most sports fit into one of two categories: either what I’ll call a time-constant sport, or an opportunity-constant sport. Individual squash vs NSL squash perfectly illustrates this contrast. Individual squash is an opportunity-constant sport. Each game of squash is played to 11, and the game is won once that target is reached. It does not matter if it takes 2 minutes or 30 minutes. The target is always the same. Another example of an opportunity-constant sport is baseball. It doesn’t matter how long the game takes; each team gets exactly nine innings to score runs. In short, the time is unknown, the amount of opportunities to score points is known. 

 

Time-constant sports are any sport with a clock. Basketball, football, and hockey all qualify. So does NSL squash. In these sports, the amount of time each team gets to score points is constant. The number of opportunities to score points within that time varies. For example, look at the difference between the two matches from April 11th. Chicago vs Nashville contained 138 total points, while Greenwich vs Newport had just 93. Both matches were the typical 70 minutes of the NSL format, just with wildly different point totals. 

 

I mentioned the term pace. Faster pace means more scoring opportunities per unit of time (minute, period, match, etc); slower pace means fewer scoring opportunities. Lake Erie expertly utilized a slow pace to keep the match close against Greenwich. 

 

Why was this important? Lake Erie was at a talent deficit. When you’re essentially David going against Goliath, the best way to combat the NSL equivalent of Goliath (the Panthers) is to limit the number of opportunities they get to realize that talent advantage. In other words, slow down the pace!

 

Tom Walsh’s Immense Impact 

 

Tom Walsh led Lake Erie with 34 minutes played. He also had by far the least amount of points per minute on the team. 

 

Points Minutes Points/Min
Ben Smith 22 20 1.1
Tom Walsh 25 34 0.74
David Baillargeon 15 16 0.94

 

You could look at this chart and say Walsh was clearly the worst player, but that’s a woefully incomplete analysis. Lake Erie wanted to play at a slow pace and limit Greenwich’s scoring opportunities. They tasked Walsh with doing so, and he did a phenomenal job. In Period 1, 10 total points were scored (Greenwich 6-4 Lake Erie) in the 9 minutes Walsh was on court. 27 were scored in the following 11 minutes. In Period 2: 16 points scored in the 10 minutes Walsh was on court and 21 in the 10 minutes Walsh was off. Walsh meaningfully slowed the game down and limited the opportunities Greenwich had to realize their talent advantage. 

 

In Period 3, Walsh was forced to play faster, as he was playing from behind to close out the match. Walsh was forced into a utility role in Period 3 against Mostafa Asal, who played lights out. That was always a tall task for Walsh. In addition, slow pace becomes much tougher to achieve in Period 3. Ten more minutes on the clock and two additional power plays means an unavoidable and substantial increase in scoring opportunities compared to Periods 1 and 2. Winning Period 3 requires a degree of clinical attacking play and outplaying your opponent as a result. Greenwich was always the favorite in that context. Still, Lake Erie had to slow things down in Periods 1 and 2 to give themselves a fighting chance to win. They did just that thanks to Tom Walsh. 

 

Fans and league personnel alike have crowned Ben Smith as Lake Erie’s MVP in their inspiring performance against Greenwich. For me, Walsh was the MVP. His impact on the pace of play in this match gave Lake Erie a real chance to win despite everyone counting them out. The coaching staff had a phenomenal game plan, and the players executed it perfectly. The only thing that prevented them from winning was Mostafa Asal playing like the World #1. 

 

What innovative plan will Lake Erie cook up against Newport this weekend? I’m excited to find out.  

https://nslsport.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pace-Article-Thumbnail.png 321 845 Michael Neff https://nslsport.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NSL.webp Michael Neff2026-05-14 11:17:292026-05-14 11:17:29How Lake Erie Utilized Pace Against Greenwich

The Seemingly Insignificant Rule Swinging NSL Matches

May 1, 2026/in Uncategorized/by Michael Neff

 

The power play. Everyone who follows the NSL knows it and loves it at this point. What you may not know is that coaches can not call power plays inside the final four minutes of a period. This rule has swung matches this season in ways no one anticipated. The obvious example? Greenwich vs Newport on April 11th. Period 3 of the Greenwich vs Newport match contained a four minute rally between Mostafa Asal and Yahya Elnawasany, during which the clock ticked below four minutes. Greenwich could not call their final power play, and the match was out of reach. 

 

The “four minute rule,” as I’ll call it from here, may seem like an insignificant addendum to the NSL rulebook. Most of the time, it is. But, poor decision making surrounding the four minute rule can cost teams matches. I doubt an instance as absurd as Greenwich’s loss to Newport happens any time soon. That said, the four minute rule can still rear its ugly head in subtler ways. Last weekend’s match between the Philadelphia Lightning and New York Knights was one such instance. Let’s talk about it. 

 

The Situation

In Period 2, New York led 24-15 with 6:09 on the clock. Star player Ean Yow Ng was on court against Marwan ElShorbagy, and thoroughly outplaying him. Ng outscored Marwan 5-2 in their shared court time. Philly still had their power play, but it felt like New York was firmly in control of the 2nd period. The Knights ended up losing 32-31. How’d that happen?

 

Well, at that 6:09 mark, New York subbed on Adegoke Onaopemipo (world #183). The likely logic behind the change was managing Adegoke’s minutes. I imagine New York wanted Adegoke to get close to the required 15 minute threshold and preserve flexibility for the third period. With a nine point lead, New York likely saw this as an opportune time to balance preserving the lead with getting Adegoke his minutes. 

 

A couple problems with that. First of all, New York needed 3 or 4 period points to have a chance at the playoffs. They lost Period 1, so Period 2 was the last chance to fight for playoff contention. Second, this was not the time to interrupt Ean Yow Ng’s dominant play. Keep the four minute rule in mind. Had New York played him for just two more minutes, Philly would have had to call their power play against Ng instead of a cold Adegoke. That’s a much tougher proposition for Marwan. There was only so much time left in the period for Philly to call the power play, and New York could have ensured Ng was on court for it instead of Adegoke. Obviously it didn’t play out that way. 

 

Philly wasted no time calling their power play. Marwan scored six points during the power play and trimmed New York’s lead to just three. Had Ng stayed on court through the four-minute mark, New York would have dulled the impact of Philly’s power play. They could have subbed on Adegoke immediately after, adding four minutes to his total and giving him more of a cushion to close out the period. 

 

Defending a Lead Using the Four Minute Rule

New York made a critical error by giving Marwan an extra two minutes against a cold Adegoke Onaopemipo to chip away at the lead. Philadelphia Lightning co-owner BG Lemmon admitted the team’s surprise at New York’s management of the period on the National Squash League Podcast: “If they left Ean Yao out for just an extra two minutes, which he could have done, we’re probably not gonna call that power play and New York might have had a better shot.” 

 

We’ve already discussed what New York should have done differently, and BG’s quote highlights it once again. Subbing on Adegoke while he was still vulnerable to defend a power play proved a divisive error. With four minutes on the clock, the variance of outcomes in an NSL period drastically decreases. The scoring margin isn’t likely to change much with no power plays remaining and not a ton of time left. Put differently, each NSL period has a four minute margin of safety built in. 

 

That margin of safety could have been a real defensive resource for New York. In some ways, it still was! They had a chance to win the period despite their player ranking 174 points behind Philly’s. The difference between a win and a loss in Period 2 was depriving Ean Yow Ng of two more minutes of play, thus bringing New York to the four minute threshold with what you could only assume would be a larger lead. 

 

New York’s situation: six minutes left, a sizable lead, a weak link that needs minutes, and their opponent hasn’t called the power play, is fairly common in the NSL. It was no secret that Philly was hunting the Adegoke matchup for their power plays. They held on to the power play for the whole second period waiting for him to get on court. New York didn’t have to afford Philly the opportunity for their dream power play matchup, yet they did anyway. 

 

Teams can use this match as a cautionary tale for how not to manage this situation. This is another example of the NSL format rewarding teams that deeply understand its nuances and punishing those that don’t. The Philadelphia Lightning have never lost an NSL match because of their command of the format. New York was strategically outclassed by both Atlanta and Philly on their way to an 0-2 season. 

 

Last weekend was another strong signal to players, coaches, and executives across the NSL. Strategic play and command of the NSL format is THE competitive advantage that drives winning in this league. New York provided a concrete data point for how mismanaging a seemingly innocuous rule can go wrong. The question is whether teams will adjust accordingly. 

https://nslsport.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Four-Minute-Rule-Article-Thumbnail.png 321 845 Michael Neff https://nslsport.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NSL.webp Michael Neff2026-05-01 11:55:202026-05-01 11:55:20The Seemingly Insignificant Rule Swinging NSL Matches

Categories

  • 2024 NSL
  • 2025 NSL
  • Draft News
  • Player Information
  • Results
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • October 2023

© 2026 National Squash League | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Refunds and Returns

Website Design and Development by Honeywick

Scroll to top